Hello, dear Sagemaster Team, I would be very happy if there were a tool for the Forex sector similar to AI Grid in the crypto sector

Sandra Pittner 5 days ago

💡

Feature Request

Hi SageMaster team, I would like to request support for OANDA MT5 in SageMaster SFX. Currently, OANDA Corporation appears as an available broker when selecting MT4, but I cannot find OANDA as an option when selecting MT5. This is becoming important because OANDA Japan has announced that its MT4 service will end in 2026. For users in Japan, OANDA is one of the safer and more trusted regulated broker options, so being able to connect OANDA MT5 would be very valuable. My main concerns are: OANDA MT4 is not suitable as a long-term option because the service is scheduled to end. OANDA MT5 would be a more practical and safer choice for Japanese users. Many alternative brokers available in MT5 may be overseas brokers, and some users may feel less comfortable using them for larger deposits. After experiencing compliance issues with another broker, I now place high priority on broker reliability, clear regulation, and stable withdrawals. If possible, please consider adding OANDA MT5 support before OANDA MT4 becomes unavailable. It would also be helpful if SageMaster could clarify: Whether OANDA MT5 support is already planned. Which OANDA entity/server would be supported. Whether Japanese users would be able to connect OANDA Japan MT5 accounts. Thank you for considering this request.

Akiei Ohashi 5 days ago

Medium Priority

💡

Feature Request

No encuentro el indicador Sessions LuxAlgo que tambien uso en mi tradingview y aqui con magic terminal no me aparece. Seria genial que este indicador este disponible para nosotros los usuarios que lo usamos en nuestros analisis del mercado y poder estar habilitado antes de iniciar la liga wes FX.

Andrea Castaneda 7 days ago

💡

Feature Request

Good morning, it would be great if the TradingView date always appeared in the area I set up, so I wouldn't have to reconfigure it every time I open the Magic Terminal. Also, it would be helpful to be able to add an 8-hour timeframe that isn't available for trading. Thank you for your commitment to improving the user experience.

Andrea Castaneda 8 days ago

Jun 30

💡

Feature Request

añadir Deriv (V) Ltd a cuenta de corredores en sagemaster

Juan Esteban Navarrete Scarpeta 9 days ago

💡

Feature Request

Add option to use currency amount for risk calculation instead of just lots and % of account. E.g. I want to risk 100€ on my EURUSD Trade with a SL of 15 Pips. Currently its not possible to do so, except you calculate how much % this is of your account (takes time and understanding) or you use manual lot size which requires a calculator as well.

Aycan Schaffler 18 days ago

Jun 30

High Priority

💡

Feature Request

Shared Margin Pool lets strategies within the same pack use unused margin from the pack when their own allocation is fully used. This helps reduce missed trades caused by rigid per-strategy limits, while still keeping pack-level risk controlled. What’s changing: An optional Shared Margin toggle will be available during pack setup and in admin settings. How it works: When enabled, strategies can temporarily draw from available pack margin, but order sizing remains constrained by allocation rules and total usage cannot exceed the pack balance. Default behavior: Off by default, so existing packs keep the current allocation-only behavior.

Hana 26 days ago

Jun 30

💡

Feature Request

We’re bringing your backtest workflow closer to live setup. You’ll be able to take a backtest result, turn it into a new Strategy Pack, review the pre-filled configuration, and save it with much less manual work.

Hana about 1 month ago

Apr 30

💡

Feature Request

Hey, when you update your Presets, it could be good if you could edit it, before selecting the “Sync Strategy”, mostly with the Money Management and the Drawdown settings, because you may want to use your own risk and safety setup, then the providers. But also, it may not be everything at all you want to sync with, maybe you want a few other things in settings to be diffrent from the preset, but still want some of the presets update. So if you could have the options to select / edit it, as you want it, so not all are changed to the presets, so you need to remember and change it back after.. If this makes sense ?

Kenneth Moller about 1 month ago

Jun 30

💡

Feature Request

When to put Sl the best

Natasja De Cock about 2 months ago

DeepSage

hello team! Is it possible to improve this pop-up / selection window? It’s not very convenient, and it’s often difficult to drag. If it could disappear from the screen when the chart is open, or be improved from this point of view, that would be much better.

Noemi Taranto 3 months ago

💡

Feature Request

Right now its possible to edit the strategy pack as a whole thing. For the future it would be good to edit the several strategies in the way you set up one strategie. For example edit the break even point or tp ladder or trailing stop. This is not possible rn in the strategy pack

Christian Forderer 3 months ago

💡

Feature Request

Challenges arise particularly with high-frequency strategies using tight entries, stop-losses, and take-profit levels. Due to external factors beyond system control—such as broker liquidity, spread differences, slippage, latency, volatility, and timezones—the same trade idea can lead to different execution outcomes across users (TP, SL, break-even, or no execution). While provider-based statistics may be structurally correct, they are not reliably reproducible at scale across multiple brokers and real market conditions. Proposed Improvement Introduce an additional performance layer based on aggregated real-account execution data, calculated: per Trade Provider per strategy Displayed alongside existing statistics, this would clearly distinguish between: Theoretical / Provider Performance Real-Account Average Performance This approach cannot eliminate execution variance, but it provides the most realistic and transparent representation of expected outcomes, especially for high-frequency strategies.

Stefan Kassing 3 months ago

💡

Feature Request

I am reporting an improvement based on this exact customer inquiry in Discord : ‘Hey, quick question to the backtest tool. Is it calculating with increasing lotsize? Since 1% Risk Management will mean higher lotsize with increasing balance. Didn't see it in the results or anywhere. So i was curios about I have investigated this using an initial balance of $10,000 and 20 leverage. The system is scaling dynamically. For the exact same 2-pip move on Gold (11/06/2025 at 02:20 AM), the profit changed based on the risk setting, proving that the lot size is recalculating at the moment of entry: Fixed 0.10 Lot: $2.00 Profit 1% Risk: $1.60 Profit 4% Risk: $5.40 Profit" Requested Improvement "While the backend math is correct, it is difficult for users to see the lot size changes because they are not listed in the 'Trades' tab. I suggest adding a 'Lot Size' column to the Trades list so users can see the compounding effect as their balance grows." Adding these columns as well directly to the Trades list will solve the confusion about dynamic lot sizing: Metric Why it help transparency Lot Size Proves the system is compounding and scaling based on balance. Pip Value Shows exactly how much 1 pip is worth for that specific trade. Risk-Reward (R:R) Displays the target profit vs. the potential loss for every setup. Holding Time Tells the user how long the trade stayed open (seconds, minutes, or hours). Stop Loss (Price) Clearly shows the "Main SL" level so users can verify the risk math. also Transactions Tab (Cost Disclosure): If it possble to Show a clear list of all commissions, fees, and slippage adjustments. If possible, show a clear list of all commissions, fees, and slippage adjustments. Many users think their profit is lower due to a bug, when it is actually just the impact of trading costs. Tip for Your Suggestion When you post to the SGM site, suggest adding a "Vectored" or "Pessimistic" execution toggle in the summary. This allows users to see the "Worst Case Scenario" for their strategy, which builds massive trust in the platform's honesty. Thank you

Mohamed Ahmed 4 months ago

Medium Priority

💡

Feature Request

We need a button / function to make the magic terminal chart bigger, something like a focus mode without things that can disctract people. This is also better for using magic terminal in live sessions because then the chart appearance will be better for the customers. This is essential for implementing magic terminal into the daily analysis and trading. A button to hide everything what is not needed for analysis and trading and just the chart on the whole screen. Tank you

Christian Forderer 4 months ago

2

💡

Feature Request

Hey team! Please add a notification IF your broker account gets disconnected. This has happened for people using pepperstone Demo account, since Pepperstone has changed their servers. And this would have been notified earlier of there was a notification sent. Thank you :)

Max Milian Nilsenius 4 months ago

1

💡

Feature Request

I would like that after executing the operation in the magic terminal, we could click on the operation and see how all the configuration is being executed.

Ivan Andres Zagarra Rojano 4 months ago

💡

Feature Request

Hi, I suggest to implement the filter for the order history by provider, so we can see the performance of the signal providers one by one, in order to implement the best strategy. Thank you

Kristian Rama 5 months ago

💡

Feature Request

The option for time and price tolerance are great and important when it comes to accound safety against bad order execution. In the next step there should be a option to validate the re entry automatically, but not only by price or time. Because this parameters do not cover how the trade was developing before hitting entry area again. So in my oppinion this option looks like this: Sagemaster monitors also missed trades as if they were executed with the preset. As long as the trades individuell preset didnt hit any conditions that would change something in trademanagement - the trade remain valide once the entry area is hit again. For example: Preset 30 Pips SL and BE after 40 Pips. TP1 —> 60 Pips First i dont know if price and time tolerance only works in profit direction for the trade. So if we enter to much distance from the entry to stop execution but in draw down direction this would mean a better entry and should be executed. But maybe this is implemented already - didn´t check in detail. But to come to the idea of trade validation: —> Trade wasn´t executed because of price tolerance. —> Price moves in profit direction for 30 Pips in Maximum. —> Price comes back to entry area Validation check: No trade management relevant action would happened with executed trade no TP hit and also no BE move. So trade will be executed. Example 2: —> Trade runs 70 Pips into Profit —> TP triggered and SL to BE —> Market comes back to entry —> no execution. Hope this helps you to understand my idea. This would increase provider usage with great results by remaining secured from bad order execution.

Fabian Glatthaar 5 months ago

2

High Priority

💡

Feature Request